By Paul Kiel - April 9, 2007, 9:14 AMgo to original
The New York Times delivers the first major report on the surge's progress this morning, a painstaking effort involving statistics and on the ground reports. The verdict?
American casualties are down in Iraq's provinces, but way up in Baghdad.
Sectarian killings are down, but increased use of car bombs has kept the civilian death toll high -- and anyway the beheadings seem to be surging again.
And as the U.S. moves to confront insurgents, the groups seem to be fracturing, making the fight increasingly confusing.
Or as an American private in the First Battalion, Fifth Cavalry puts it:
“The insurgents, they see what we’re doing and we see what they’re doing. Then we get ahead, then they figure out what we’ve done and they get ahead.
“It’s like a game of cat and mouse. It’s just a really, really smart mouse.”
Is the Surge Working?
Is the surge even working? It is costing a lot in lives, and in resources. Is it worth it?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment